You hear from the talking heads on TV the Science shows this or that. Politicians say the Science shows and yet nether the talking heads and by far politicians know what the Science really is and what Scientific Method involves. One thing about the Scientific Method there is no censorship where one theory is pushed above all others. When censorship occurs in Science it is pushing an agenda or by selecting the research that fit a narrative and discounting all others. However, the true scientific method never stops refining a hypothesis. There are steps to the Scientific Method and they are:

1. Make an observation.
2. Ask a question.
3. Form a hypothesis, or testable explanation.
4. Make a prediction based on the hypothesis.
5. Test the prediction.
6. Iterate: use the results to make new hypotheses or predictions.

The scientific method is used in all sciences—including chemistry, physics, geology, and psychology. The scientists in these fields ask different questions and perform different tests. However, they use the same core approach to find answers that are logical and supported by evidence.

One does not stop when the hypothesis matches the prediction. One keeps iterating the same tests to see if the same results time and time again giving the same environment variable (outside factions) of which the observation is based.

Science like it when a theory is challenged. We have seen this over the history of mankind from the flat Earth theory to the Earth is not the center of the universe. This also applies to Medical Science where an observation and a theory must be challenged and retested as outside factors change. This is one reason that experimental drugs should take longer to factor in all external and internal factors that can impact the theory. Rushing any theory and not Iterate given new external and/or internal factors leads to very bad science and results in a narrative for a purpose that in most cases are ill for the general population where this weak theory is pushed.

Think about all the current theories about COVID, masks, experimental drugs and known related issues. A lot of the above was rushed theories that after rigorous testing. Rigor is the formal, objective, and repeatable process with the goal of evaluating test plans to identify them as sufficiently rigorous or call out specific topics for targeted improvement. Even climate change debate has a number of theories and yet none has been proven and fail under rigor and applying other external and internal factors. It does not mean th e theory is wrong, but is not exact yet or has not been proven by independent research as fact. Here is an example of the application of the scientific method using toast. As you read this think of all the external and internal factors that could impact the observation:

1. Make an observation.

Let's suppose that you get two slices of bread, put them into the toaster, and press the button. However, your bread does not toast.

2. Ask a question.

Why didn't my bread get toasted?

3. Propose a hypothesis.

A hypothesis is a potential answer to the question, one that can somehow be tested. For example, our hypothesis in this case could be that the toast didn't toast because the electrical outlet is broken.

Note: This hypothesis is not necessarily the right explanation. Instead, it's a possible explanation that we can test to see if it is likely correct, or if we need to make a new hypothesis.

4. Make predictions.

A prediction is an outcome we'd expect to see if the hypothesis is correct. In this case, we might predict that if the electrical outlet is broken, then plugging the toaster into a different outlet should fix the problem.

5. Test the predictions.

To test the hypothesis, we need to make an observation or perform an experiment associated with the prediction. For instance, in this case, we would plug the toaster into a different outlet and see if it toasts.

6. Iterate.

The last step of the scientific method is to reflect on our results and use them to guide our next steps.

What happened if the circuit breaker tripped on that plug? You need to start the test again with this as the theory and continue until you consistently obtain toasted bread. Remember the bread could also be a factor and theory must be tested as well.

As you can see the Scientific Method if used correctly does not question other theories but tests them and use the results to refine the theory and test again with the new theory. This can include an almost infinite number of external and internal factors.

Yet as with history there are groups that dictate what the theory is and what the observation and outcome will be. Thus one must be very careful about any so called Science from the Government or special interest groups due to their bias (selection of specific external and internal factors) to drive an desired outcome. True Science welcome all comments and observations and only makes the theory stronger with the consideration of other external and internal factors related to the observation and the improved theory.

Remember to continue to refine the theory as more information or questions arise. The Scientific Method is repetitive and is never final as new information, is received related to the observation and the current theory that is change to include additional information. This is never settled and there is always room for improvement as time and technology proceeds.

The attached images shows this process of repeating and improving the theory about a given observation. It never ends. Thus you understand that there is no such thing as settled Science when the Scientific Method is concerned.